Charles Darwin tangled natural selection theory into contradictory webs of logic writing in his Down House library (pictured left). In the shadow of a solidarity façade lingers one hard-core reality question—is natural selection scientifically valid? Is natural selection based on a natural law or even a series of natural laws, or is natural selection a belief?
The answer may be surprising. Like Isaac Newton’s discovery of the laws of gravity, did Darwin arrive at natural selection through an organized collection of measured and testable observations expressible in an equation? No. Natural selection is a belief. As Darwin explains –
“The theory of natural selection is grounded on the belief that each new variety and ultimately each new species is produced and maintained by having some advantage over those with which it comes into competition.”
After twenty years of work on his nearly five-hundred-page book, Darwin entangled his concepts of natural selection into a maze of inconsistencies and implicit and explicit contradictions. Darwin conceded –
“Natural selection … is by far the most serious special difficulty which my theory has encountered.”
Interestingly, while “natural selection” is not defined in the book’s appendix, in complying with the principles of science, Darwin includes the following falsifiability test for his theory –
“If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection.”
Fossil record evidence has since demonstrated that the lineages of Earth’s animals did start as a burst of life, popularly known as the Cambrian Explosion, sometimes called the Biological Big Bang. Using Darwin’s test, the fossil record has proved fatal to Darwin’s theory of natural selection.
Top Fifteen Contradictions
Darwin’s gradual desertion of the scientific method proved costly. In a letter to Alfred Wallace (pictured right) in 1868, Darwin concedes to the contradictory elephant-in-the-room –
“Nevertheless, I myself to a certain extent contradict my own remark.”
Power
“I can see no limit to this power, in slowly and beautifully adapting each form to the most complex relations of life.”
Contradicted by:
“If the numbers be wholly kept down by the causes just indicated, as will often have been the case, natural selection will be powerless in certain beneficial directions; but this is no valid objection to its efficiency at other times and in other ways; for we are far from having any reason to suppose that many species ever undergo modification and improvement at the same time in the same area.”
Perfection
“There is no logical impossibility in the acquirement of any conceivable degree of perfection through natural selection.”
Contradicted by:
“Natural selection will not produce absolute perfection, nor do we always meet, as far as we can judge, with this high standard under nature.”
Preservation
“Further we must suppose that there is a power, represented by natural selection or the survival of the fittest, always intently watching each slight alteration.”
Contradicted by:
“Natural selection should not have preserved or rejected each little deviation.”
Mutual Good
“What natural selection cannot do, is to modify the structure of one species, without giving it any advantage, for the good of another species.”
Contradicted by:
“Natural selection can and does often produce structures for the direct injury of other animals.”
Economy
“Natural selection acts solely through the preservation of variations in some way advantageous, which consequently endure.”
Contradicted by:
“Variations neither useful nor injurious would not be affected by natural selection.”
Chance
“Mere chance, as we may call it, might cause one variety to differ in some character from its parents, and the offspring of this variety again to differ from its parent in the very same character and in a greater degree; but this alone would never account for so habitual and large a degree of difference as that between the species of the same genus.”
“I was so convinced that not even a stripe of colour appears from what is commonly called chance.”
Contradicted by:
“As many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive; and as, consequently, there is a frequently recurring struggle for existence, it follows that any being, if it vary however slightly in any manner profitable to itself, under the complex and sometimes varying conditions of life, will have a better chance of surviving, and thus be naturally selected. From the strong principle of inheritance, any selected variety will tend to propagate its new and modified form.”
Variations. Arise infinitely.
“In living bodies, variation will cause the slight alteration, generation will multiply them almost infinitely, and natural selection will pick out with unerring skill each improvement.”
Contradicted by:
“We have seen that species at any one period are not indefinitely variable, and are not linked together by a multitude of intermediate gradations.”
Variations. Accumulate continuously.
“I can see no difficulty in natural selection preserving and continually accumulating variations.”94 And, “An extraordinary amount of modification implies an unusually large and long-continued amount of variability, which has continually been accumulated by natural selection for the benefit of the species.
Contradicted by:
“Natural selection has succeeded in giving a fixed character to the organ, in however extraordinary a manner it may have been developed.”96 And, “From the fact of the above characters being unimportant for the welfare of the species, any slight variations which occurred in them would not have been accumulated and augmented through natural selection.”
Variations. Natural selection causes variability.
“In one sense the conditions of life may be said not only to cause variability, either directly or indirectly, but likewise to include natural selection.”
Contradicted by:
“Some have even imagined that natural selection induces variability, whereas it implies only the preservation of such variations.”
Variations. Natural selection overcomes variability.
“… natural selection having more or less completely, according to the lapse of time, overmastered the tendency to reversion and to further variability.”
Contradicted by:
“For variation is a long-continued and slow process, and natural selection will in such cases not as yet have had time to overcome the tendency to further variability.”
Efficiency
“For the best definition which has ever been given of a high standard of organisation, is the degree to which the parts have been specialised or differentiated; and natural selection tends towards this end, inasmuch as the parts are thus enabled to perform their functions more efficiently.”31
Contradicted by:
“Natural selection either has not or cannot come into full play, and thus the organisation is left in a fluctuating condition.”
Transitional Links
“By the theory of natural selection, all living species have been connected with the parent-species of each genus, by differences not greater than we see between the natural and domestic varieties of the same species at the present day … So that the number of intermediate and transitional links, between all living and extinct species, must have been inconceivably great. But assuredly, if this theory be true, such have lived upon the Earth.”
Contradicted by:
“We have seen that species at any one period are not indefinitely variable, and are not linked together by a multitude of intermediate gradations.”
Extinction
“Lastly, looking not to any one time, but at all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed; but the very process of natural selection constantly tends, as has been so often remarked, to exterminate the parent-forms and the intermediate links.”
Contradicted by:
“On our theory, the continued existence of lowly organisms offers no difficulty; for natural selection, or the survival of the fittest, does not necessarily include progressive development—it only takes advantage of such variations as [they] arise and are beneficial to each creature under its complex relations of life.”
Natural Selection
“On the theory of natural selection, we can clearly understand the full meaning of that old canon in natural history.”
Contradicted by:
“Natural selection, and likewise because this is by far the most serious special difficulty which my theory has encountered.”
Paleontology
“Passing from these difficulties, the other great leading facts in paleontology agree admirably with the theory of descent with modification through variation and natural selection.”
Contradicted by:
“Existence of many links … does not yield the infinitely many fine gradations between past and present species required on the theory.”
Causative Factors
While starting with the inductive principles of science early in his career, the deductive philosophy of the progressive Enlightenment movement increasingly influenced Darwin. As Darwin confided to Asa Gray in an 1857 letter –
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science.”
Philosophy, Not Science
Although awarded a Royal Medal by the Royal Society in 1853 for his early works, Darwin’s work became increasingly influenced by the anti-science philosophy of the progressive Enlightenment movement. Darwin never again received an award from any scientific organization following the Origin of Species. Since natural selection is a deductive reasoning philosophy, not expressible mathematically, the theory is not scientifically valid.
Natural Selection Links
View natural selection from different perspectives by clicking on the following links. Starting with Darwinian Natural Selection, which highlights how Darwin defined natural selection in the Origin of Species –
Darwinian Natural Selection – how Darwin defined and used the theory of natural selection in the Origin of Species.
Logic and Science, Natural Selection – how Darwin applied logic and the principles of science in the Origin of Species to develop the theory of natural selection.
Parallel Natural Selection Theories – how Darwin’s theory of natural selection emerged in the context of other naturalists, specifically Alfred Russel Wallace and Patrick Matthew
Modern Natural Selection – how modern evolutionary scientists view the role of natural selection – currently under construction.
Critics of Natural Selection – how evolution scientists have criticized the theory of natural selection.
Refer to the Glossary for the definition of terms
